NAA vs Bond arms

[Anvil]

I asked my wife if she would be interested in the new NAA MS - Rose.
She said she would prefer the Bond Arms honey B because it looked more detrimental.  She said women don't want flower guns but serious business guns for self defense. So i guess Guns and Roses is not really a thing! 

[top dog]

Anvil,
Obviously I have NAAs but also a Bond as well.

Past experience is to let the little lady choose what she wants.

Bond quality like NAA is superb and customer service is 2nd to none.

In fact,if you call Bond Arms,you may very well be talking with Gordon Bond.

                                                                   Top Dog

[OV-1D]

  One would think novelties are the rage of today but only if they increase in value within months if not days .I can see adolescence or gang bangers wanting such a thing (gold) but adults especially the colored ones I don't think so . Wish they would put their brain power into a new model or at least  more of the latest models like break tops (long barreled) plus think about the prices of these kinda expensive pieces . There is a limit in which I'll pay for somethings , honestly. Now-a-days its more for less is the buy of the day . Just my opinion mind ya.  

[Anvil]

I agree, most of us devoted to this forum want a good and practical shooter, not a fancy looker!
Drop the silly colors and add hard case finish and blued high luster models to your inventory and we will buy!
Novelties are out, and the serious dedicated NAA shooters request to be heard on this forum.
I want a black finish for my Shorty. How hard would that be to produce

 

[bill_deshivs]

NAA guns are all stainless steel. You can't blue stainless. You can nitride it, PVD coat it, or paint it.
A mini revolver made of blued carbon steel would rust the third day it was in your pocket.

[top dog]

All of the above thoughts are very good a true

Good,solid,functional designs and craftmanship are things I look for.

                                        Top Dog

[heyjoe]

i could go for an NAA two shot derringer much smaller and lighter than bond arms

[bill_deshivs]

A Bond Arms derringer is about as big as a .38 Special "J" frame S&W.

[RogueTS1]

i could go for an NAA two shot derringer much smaller and lighter than bond arms

We concur with this philosophy.

[OV-1D]

I seriously doubt NAA making anything over 32 caliber anymore , and never ever a 38 caliber sized gun . Think how large that would actually be .Besides that 38 and up calibers are well accounted for by other manufacturers , it would be a waste of valuable revenues . That 32 rimfire could be a real good seller but theres only one manufacturer of that caliber but I have three boxes of fifties ,Ha . Go ahead and make that gun no bigger than NAA's shorty 22 , will need boot grips though , those 32's have a desent kick .       

[old_dpg]

Has she actually held either or both of these guns?  Bond guns, except for the aluminum frame Stinger and Stubby, are just too *** heavy.  Heavy guns have a tendency to stay home.

The Black Widow is small, light, excellent sights, a wonderful secure comfortable grip and 22 magnum out of a two inch barrel is nothing to sneeze at.

[Anvil]

i could go for an NAA two shot derringer much smaller and lighter than bond arms

That's what my wife wants more than having a revolver!
I think it is a Paladin sindrome!  LOL